Benchmarks
View scores and output across OCR models spanning many document categories.
Want to run these evals on your own documents?
Talk to Sales3. To define the associator, notice that for , both the spaces and are given by the retract of the idempotent
which can be verified using ( Axiom 1 ). We then define the associator as the canonical map between the two retracts. One can check that is an -module map, and satisfies the pentagon equation.
4. Given , we set the left unitor to be the restriction of the map
on ; we set the right unitor to be the restriction of the map
on . One can check that and are indeed invertible -module maps, and satisfy the triangle equations.
5. The left dual of an object is given by the dual vector space endowed with the -action
Similarly, the right dual of is given by endowed with -action
Secondly, note that is clearly a finite -linear category, with the tensor product being bi- -linear. This concludes our construction of .
1.20 Example. We illustrate the above construction of when is the weak Hopf algebra defined in Example 1.17. Since a left -module is precisely a - -bimodule, is equivalent to as categories. It remains to find the monoidal structure on . Given left -modules and , which we identify as - -bimodules, the underlying vector space of is the retract of the idempotent
The action of on is given by the restriction of the map
on . Using Corollary 1.5, it can be shown that the - -bimodule is precisely .
To find the tensor unit of , one first computes
12